There is a nice little series of posts on Brandom and Habermas and Brandom on objectivity with further comments. It looks pretty good. I’m hoping to get some comments in soon. I have been bogged down in an Aristotle paper which finally started to warp itself up. Once I get done with this I am going to try to write up some more posts, including some much delayed thoughts on model theory.
Author
Shawn Standefer, Ph.D. student in philosophy at Pitt. (More about me)
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
| Brenton Welford on Quine on analyticity | |
| Room 131 News … on On primary math education | |
| Eric Thomson on Brandomian inferentialism | |
| Eric Thomson on Brandomian inferentialism | |
| Ed Dean on Free logic books |
Categories
- Carnapia (7)
- Favorite posts (16)
- inference (36)
- inferentialism (26)
- language (87)
- logic (93)
- modality (5)
- philosophy of science (9)
- pragmatics (16)
- Quine (15)
- Uncategorized (191)
- Wittgenstein (26)
Archives
Blogroll
- 2009 Pitt-CMU Conference
- A brood comb
- Antimeta
- Brains
- Consequently.org
- Conundrum
- Crusty Philosopher
- Duckrabbit
- Grundlegung
- Honest Toil
- Inconsistent Thoughts
- It’s Only a Theory
- LogBlog
- Logic Matters
- Methods of Projection
- Nate Charlow
- Nothing of Consequence
- Obscure and Confused Ideas
- Philosophy Talk
- Possibly Philosophy
- SOH-Dan
- Soul Physics
- The boundaries of language
- The Excluded Middle
- Theories n things
- Thoughts Arguments and Rants
- wintry smile

1 comment
Comments feed for this article
December 27, 2007 at 4:33 pm
Tom
Just thought I’d leave a note here to say that I’ve replied to your helpful comment on my Brandom post just in case you missed it since it was a little while ago that you left the comment.
The post is here.