There is a review of Jeremy Wanderer’s Robert Brandom on NDPR. The reviewer is Christopher Gauker. It seems like a good review that is generally positive about the book and fairly critical about Brandom’s philosophy. Gauker thinks that Wanderer’s exposition, while accurate and generally good, doesn’t settle the question about the status of objectivity in Brandom’s view. There are scattered critical comments about Brandom’s view, particularly on his views about conditionals and linguistic scorekeeping.
Author
Shawn Standefer, Ph.D. student in philosophy at Pitt. (More about me)
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
| Brenton Welford on Quine on analyticity | |
| Room 131 News … on On primary math education | |
| Eric Thomson on Brandomian inferentialism | |
| Eric Thomson on Brandomian inferentialism | |
| Ed Dean on Free logic books |
Categories
- Carnapia (7)
- Favorite posts (16)
- inference (36)
- inferentialism (26)
- language (87)
- logic (93)
- modality (5)
- philosophy of science (9)
- pragmatics (16)
- Quine (15)
- Uncategorized (191)
- Wittgenstein (26)
Archives
Blogroll
- 2009 Pitt-CMU Conference
- A brood comb
- Antimeta
- Brains
- Consequently.org
- Conundrum
- Crusty Philosopher
- Duckrabbit
- Grundlegung
- Honest Toil
- Inconsistent Thoughts
- It’s Only a Theory
- LogBlog
- Logic Matters
- Methods of Projection
- Nate Charlow
- Nothing of Consequence
- Obscure and Confused Ideas
- Philosophy Talk
- Possibly Philosophy
- SOH-Dan
- Soul Physics
- The boundaries of language
- The Excluded Middle
- Theories n things
- Thoughts Arguments and Rants
- wintry smile

No comments yet
Comments feed for this article